Use Advanced Search to search the entire archive.
[jsr363-experts] Public Review Ballot
- From: Werner Keil <
>
- To: "
" <
>
- Subject: [jsr363-experts] Public Review Ballot
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 11:06:57 +0100
Dear Experts,
Happy to see, the Public Review Ballot passed yesterday with only "Yes"
votes and just a few EC members who could not vote for reasons we may guess
(at least in the case of CS;-)
https://jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=5837
The EC presentation (the slides will be online as soon as minutes are
published) Leo and I gave in Rio also was well-received. LJC had feedback
there and also commented on the PR ballot.
Their suggestions on test coverage and general coding format or conventions
are clearly appreciated. Where we identify automated tools similar to
what's been done about the license, we'll add those to the build chain.
What needs contribution by everyone who is able and capable are the actual
tests. Both unit tests (mostly RI, indirectly that'll benefit the SE port
and potential future OpenJDK donation, too;-) and the TCK.
Thanks for your contributions to this stage.
Regards,
Werner Keil | JCP Executive Committee Member, JSR 363 Co Spec Lead |
Eclipse UOMo Lead, Babel Language Champion | Apache Committer
Twitter @wernerkeil | @UnitAPI | @JSR354 | @AgoravaProj | @DeviceMap
| #DevOps | #EclipseUOMo
Skype werner.keil | Google+ gplus.to/wernerkeil
[jsr363-experts] Public Review Ballot
|
Werner Keil |
01/26/2016 |