Skip to main content

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

  • From: Werner Keil < >
  • To: " " < >
  • Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?
  • Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 16:18:50 +0100

Thanks, it seems almost everyone voted, at least a majority of 6 (with
Martin's reply earlier as 7) votes of 9 EG members.

Will mark all other quantities @Deprecated and a Q2 release (0.8-RC3) of
the API should contain only those we plan to include by the end of this
month.

Regards,

Werner

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Legrand, Karen 
< >
wrote:

>  +1 for Option 2
>
>
>
> *From:* Werner Keil 
> [mailto: ]
> *Sent:* Friday, June 12, 2015 10:49 AM
> *To:* 
> 
> *Subject:* [jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities
> to keep in API?
>
>
>
> Dear Experts,
>
>
>
> Any thoughts on this?
>
>
>
> I take Martin's reply in the thread on naming (Mass)Density that he feels
> comfortable with option 2 as well.
>
> Formal confirmation appreciated, but so far this would make 2 votes for
> option 2.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Werner
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Werner Keil 
> < >
> wrote:
>
> +1 for 2.
>
>
>
> I would keep at the very least Area, Volume and Speed, a few others likely
> (though I'm not so sure about WaveNumber)
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Werner
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Werner Keil 
> < >
>  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Just to separate this from the name selection for (MassDensity), please
> advise on which of the "unnamed" Derived Quantities we'd like to keep in
> the API as opposed to other libraries (for all of SI, ISO, etc.)
>
>
>
>    1. Base Quantities + 22 "Named Quantities" (and Dimensionless) only
>    (see
>    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units#Base_units,
>    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units#Derived_units
>    )
>    2. The above plus at most
>
>  1.      Area
>
> 2.      Volume
>
> 3.      Speed
>
> 4.      Acceleration
>
> 5.      WaveNumber
>
> 6.      Density
>
>    1. The above plus all of
>    
> http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/si-brochure/section2-2.html#section2-2-1,
>    even "exotic" ones like "refractive index"
>
>  Please vote with a simple +1 for either 1, 2 or 3, no secondary choice.
> If 2 was selected we could figure out the exact number of quantities from
> that list in a second step.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>       Werner
>
>
>
>
>


[jsr363-experts] [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Werner Keil 06/09/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Werner Keil 06/10/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Werner Keil 06/12/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Legrand, Karen 06/15/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Werner Keil 06/15/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Jean-Marie Dautelle 06/12/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Leonardo Lima 06/12/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Personal Mail 06/12/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Werner Keil 06/13/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Otávio Gonçalves de Santana 06/14/2015
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close