Use Advanced Search to search the entire archive.
[jsr363-experts] Re: Specification not ready for a release today
- From: Leonardo Lima <
>
- To: "
" <
>
- Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: Specification not ready for a release today
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 17:28:08 -0200
Werner,
I proposed that we specifically say JSR275 (which was a upcoming standard
and as such had the right IP flow, I assume), Martin and Otavio (who are
the active EG in the mailing list, other than the Spec Leads) in an
Acknowledgement session in the JSR.
I didn't understand from your email. Do you see a problem with this? [Y/N]
:)
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Werner Keil
<
>
wrote:
>
>
Actually for 354 I also helped the Spec a bit, other than that Anatole did
>
a lot of the work.
>
Everyone in the EG is developer and editor, and therefore gets credit
>
simply on https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=363 already.
>
The POMs also make a difference between "developers" which in this case
>
mean EG Members and "contributors" which can be supporters of the JSR.
>
>
Until JSR 364 is final offering other forms of participation e.g. as
>
"contributor" (which the POM could probably reflect just like that) it
>
means only EG Members can officially contribute to the JSR, but that is
>
documented on the JCP page, I know a few JSRs that put the list into
>
JavaDoc (e.g. MEEP 8) and we could copy the list of EG Members into the
>
spec, too if we want.
>
>
People outside the EG especially "prior contributions" would be tricky and
>
problematic from an IP point of view. We're not allowed to take any random
>
piece of code or advice into a Java standard.
>
>
HTH,
>
Werner
>
>
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Martin Desruisseaux <
>
>
>
wrote:
>
>
>
> I stop for now (it is 3:20 AM on my side). Still have lot of open
>
> issues, but hopefully should now be closer to the current API, have less
>
> invalid statements, and more formatting.
>
>
>
> Still, given the large amount of work by non-spec leaders (including
>
> work inherited from JSR-275), would be nice if some sort of
>
> acknowledgement were written somewhere in the document. I guess that in
>
> other JSR the spec leader usually act as editors. In this case the
>
> editor work has been largely done by non-spec leaders.
>
>
>
> Martin
>
>
>
>