Use Advanced Search to search the entire archive.
[jsr363-experts] Re: FAB, JavaOne, etc.
- From: Werner Keil <
>
- To: "
" <
>
- Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: FAB, JavaOne, etc.
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 12:42:10 +0200
In fact, some of those (I started fixing mostly the Imperial system because
or a concrete bug report) could be a great goal for Hackergarten next week,
too;-)
Regards,
Werner
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Werner Keil
<
>
wrote:
>
Dear (former) Experts,
>
>
Just in case you are not subscribed to dev or users mailing lists, one
>
week ago the FAB passed:
>
https://jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=5877 (just 3 missed it because of Labor
>
Day, all of whom also did not vote on JSR 364 MR, 2 others were not allowed
>
to vote at this point)
>
>
It's fairly strange, that PMO takes such a long time between FAB passing
>
and an official Final Release page, but I assume we have to assume it's
>
because of JavaOne or the JCP EC self-nomination, some who tried said they
>
had technical problems with, or Hackergarten and other JCP related
>
activities.
>
>
If the page can't be updated before the F2F Leo and I are there and we'll
>
raise it or simply ask Heather when to expect it. One week from now we have
>
the BOF and it would be great, to see the Final Release page then although
>
what's binding is the result and that was positive;-)
>
>
Probably mention it before I leave to SF in the UoM news section.
>
>
There are some small improvements, mainly in extension modules like UoM
>
Systems, SI, etc.
>
Primarily to improve the way new units are registered in a system with a
>
proper label for toString(). New units often see the operation result like
>
"m*12345" or similar. That is mathematically correct but ugly if people
>
expect to see "in" or "ft" instead.
>
>
I explored a few details on that in the "trunk" of the RI, but I think
>
most of those can be fixed directly in those modules on top of the 1.0
>
versions.
>
>
Thanks again for your support making the Final release possible. The EG
>
officially does not exist after Final, but as soon as java.net shutdown
>
comes closer, we may either turn this into another list or just continue
>
using "units-dev" like several other JSRs (e.g. CDI) do regardless of a
>
particular number or version.
>
>
Regards,
>
>
Werner
>
>