Use Advanced Search to search the entire archive.
[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?
- From: "Legrand, Karen" <
>
- To: "
" <
>
- Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:10:29 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
+1 for Option 2
From: Werner Keil
[mailto:
]
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 10:49 AM
To:
Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to
keep in API?
Dear Experts,
Any thoughts on this?
I take Martin's reply in the thread on naming (Mass)Density that he feels
comfortable with option 2 as well.
Formal confirmation appreciated, but so far this would make 2 votes for
option 2.
Thanks,
Werner
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Werner Keil
<
<mailto:
>>
wrote:
+1 for 2.
I would keep at the very least Area, Volume and Speed, a few others likely
(though I'm not so sure about WaveNumber)
Regards,
Werner
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Werner Keil
<
<mailto:
>>
wrote:
Hi,
Just to separate this from the name selection for (MassDensity), please
advise on which of the "unnamed" Derived Quantities we'd like to keep in the
API as opposed to other libraries (for all of SI, ISO, etc.)
1. Base Quantities + 22 "Named Quantities" (and Dimensionless) only (see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units#Base_units,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units#Derived_units)
2. The above plus at most
1. Area
2. Volume
3. Speed
4. Acceleration
5. WaveNumber
6. Density
1. The above plus all of
http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/si-brochure/section2-2.html#section2-2-1,
even "exotic" ones like "refractive index"
Please vote with a simple +1 for either 1, 2 or 3, no secondary choice. If 2
was selected we could figure out the exact number of quantities from that
list in a second step.
Thanks,
Werner