Use Advanced Search to search the entire archive.
Re: Add five methods in Quantity interface[Proposal]
- From: Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>
- To:
- Subject: Re: Add five methods in Quantity interface[Proposal]
- Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 10:28:41 -0200
How is fast to do it, I did:
-
https://github.com/unitsofmeasurement/unit-impl-se/pull/41
-
https://github.com/unitsofmeasurement/unit-api/pull/23
How you can see, just added these methods without another impacts in API.
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Werner Keil
<
>
wrote:
>
No, our implementing classes do;-)
>
The API should allow Enum implementations, so on API level (I believe
>
MonetaryAmount extends it) it is a no-go, but implementing classes do.
>
>
JSR 310 alone consists of over 100 classes;-D
>
Am 01.11.2014 12:09 schrieb "Martin Desruisseaux" <
>
>:
>
>
Le 01/11/14 19:57, Werner Keil a écrit :
>
> >
>
> > I remember most of them already do;-)
>
> >
>
> You mean do not implement Comparable? LocalTime does implement
>
> Comparable, as LocalDate, Date, and more than 100 other classes in the
>
> JDK.
>
>
>
> I'm not pushing for implementing Comparable or not - I'm hesitant on
>
> that one and could be convinced either way. But I don't think that
>
> providing 'isGreater' methods without implementing Comparable is
>
> consistent, and I'm not aware of a JDK API doing that. Do you know some?
>
>
>
> Martin
>
>
>
>
--
Otávio Gonçalves de Santana
blog:
http://otaviosantana.blogspot.com.br/
twitter:
http://twitter.com/otaviojava
site: *
http://about.me/otaviojava <
http://about.me/otaviojava>*
55 (11) 98255-3513