Use Advanced Search to search the entire archive.
[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?
- From: Leonardo Lima <
>
- To: "
" <
>
- Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 08:42:27 -0200
To make it short: I think if we define a package as optional, everything
inside is optional, so you can make a package with say 10 interfaces
optional and implement 2 of them.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Martin Desruisseaux <
>
wrote:
>
>
Le 16/12/14 19:27, Leonardo Lima a écrit :
>
> I guess if we have each as a class under an optional package, it would
>
> be ok.
>
>
Maybe phrasing my question in an other way: does optionality have to be
>
at a package level? Can it be at a class/interface granularity level? Or
>
at a member level?
>
>
Martin
>
>