Use Advanced Search to search the entire archive.
Re: Email proposal to the core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
- From: Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>
- To:
- Subject: Re: Email proposal to the
- Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 07:39:07 -0200
Martin I gave permission to your email:
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Martin Desruisseaux <
>
wrote:
>
Le 01/11/14 05:12, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana a écrit :
>
>
Actually I used your, just I want explain better and talk we are open to
>
another strategie, considering Java 9 and above.
>
>
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Xtfn3FHQK_fIjc6uI3IA70OlXpG1qdntJo0zohMyIQk/edit#
>
>
I can not open the document, I get an "authorisation refused".
>
>
But Otavio, I think that "explaining the context" will just bother the JDK
>
peoples for no reason. The non-wildcard syntax is a violation of
>
parameterized type safety (unless we add a Class argument), and there is
>
no excuse for that. No context explanation can make it acceptable, and
>
nothing related to generic type reification can solve that because the
>
problem is not type erasure. All this discussion can be summarized in just
>
one question:
>
>
*Are we allowed to break Java parameterized type safety?*
>
>
You seems to believe that the answer is yes. I think it is a big no-no,
>
with no exception tolerated (at least in a public API).
>
Martin
>
>
--
Otávio Gonçalves de Santana
blog:
http://otaviosantana.blogspot.com.br/
twitter:
http://twitter.com/otaviojava
site: *
http://about.me/otaviojava <
http://about.me/otaviojava>*
55 (11) 98255-3513