Use Advanced Search to search the entire archive.
[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?
- From: Werner Keil <
>
- To: "
" <
>
- Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:09:37 +0200
+1 for 2.
I would keep at the very least Area, Volume and Speed, a few others likely
(though I'm not so sure about WaveNumber)
Regards,
Werner
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Werner Keil
<
>
wrote:
>
Hi,
>
>
Just to separate this from the name selection for (MassDensity), please
>
advise on which of the "unnamed" Derived Quantities we'd like to keep in
>
the API as opposed to other libraries (for all of SI, ISO, etc.)
>
>
>
1. Base Quantities + 22 "Named Quantities" (and Dimensionless) only
>
(see
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units#Base_units,
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units#Derived_units
>
)
>
2. The above plus at most
>
1. Area
>
2. Volume
>
3. Speed
>
4. Acceleration
>
5. WaveNumber
>
6. Density
>
3. The above plus all of
>
>
http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/si-brochure/section2-2.html#section2-2-1,
>
even "exotic" ones like "refractive index"
>
>
Please vote with a simple +1 for either 1, 2 or 3, no secondary choice. If
>
2 was selected we could figure out the exact number of quantities from that
>
list in a second step.
>
>
Thanks,
>
>
Werner
>