Use Advanced Search to search the entire archive.
[jsr363-experts] Re: Section 5 (Implementation): Range should move in the "example" section
- From: Werner Keil <
>
- To: "
" <
>
- Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: Section 5 (Implementation): Range should move in the "example" section
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:18:11 +0100
The JSR detail page (
https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=363) already
mentioned OGC Sensor Web Enablement among others as "underlying standards
and specifications".
JSR 256 as well as 310 have a Range "under the hood" but clearly part of
each Spec/API (it is in java.time.temporal, the "Spec" part of 310 though
it is almost impossible to tell where API ends and RI begins;-O)
We apply a pattern or "Spec" defined by OGC in that case, so I would not
deprive it by saying it's just an example.
What about other OCG specs, does GeoAPI call all of them "example"?;-)
It would be exactly the same case with Measurement btw.
Werner
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Martin Desruisseaux <
>
wrote:
>
I don't see the point of detailing the "Range" class in the
>
implementation section. It does not implement any of the JSR-363 API -
>
it only use it. Can we move that to the "example" section?
>
>
Martin
>
>