Use Advanced Search to search the entire archive.
[jsr363-experts] Re: Early Draft
- From: Werner Keil <
>
- To: "
" <
>
- Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: Early Draft
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:01:57 +0100
All,
I noticed java.net downloads and CMS are a bit tricky.
At least one or two files with names like JSR363Specification.pdf refuse to
get updated or replaced even when you upload a newer version.
It shows the name and size of the uploaded, but still retrieves the older
one;-/
I now uploaded a "snapshot" under a new file name. The EDR version remains
intact and frozen, that looks fine. Unless java.net webmasters can fix that
by removing other, unwanted files (looks like project admins can't) until
we exceed a quota or so, we could add more PDFs if required.
As of now the Spec has the release number 0.7.1. There is no immediate
milestone of the software until the ED goes out, but should we take recent
changes into consideration, then a "patch" if you want of 0.7.1 could be
released, too. If we went for a second ED, that could then use 0.7.2, which
reflected the "2nd" edition.
Regards,
Werner
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Werner Keil
<
>
wrote:
>
>
I'l add something accordingly under Introduction, it fits best there for
>
now.
>
>
Regards,
>
Werner
>
>
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Werner Keil
>
<
>
>
wrote:
>
>
>
> But the spec already does that:
>
>
>
> >Many contributions came from JSR 275 [JSR-275] and JSR 108 [JSR-108],
>
> earlier JCP approaches to Units of Measurement in Java.
>
>
>
> Aside from that we could follow JSR 354's pattern with a chapter like
>
> this:
>
>
>
> 1.1 Expert group
>
> This work is being conducted as part of JSR 354 under the Java Community
>
> Process Program.
>
> This specification is the result of the collaborative work of the members
>
> of the JSR 354 Expert Group and the community at large.
>
> The following persons have actively contributed to JavaMoney in
>
> alphabetical order:
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Werner
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Leonardo Lima
>
> <
>
>
> wrote:
>
>>
>
>> Werner,
>
>>
>
>> I proposed that we specifically say JSR275 (which was a upcoming
>
>> standard and as such had the right IP flow, I assume), Martin and Otavio
>
>> (who are the active EG in the mailing list, other than the Spec Leads) in
>
>> an Acknowledgement session in the JSR.
>
>>
>
>> I didn't understand from your email. Do you see a problem with this?
>
>> [Y/N] :)
>
>>
>
>>
>
>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Werner Keil
>
>> <
>
>
>> wrote:
>
>>>
>
>>> Actually for 354 I also helped the Spec a bit, other than that Anatole
>
>>> did a lot of the work.
>
>>> Everyone in the EG is developer and editor, and therefore gets credit
>
>>> simply on https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=363 already.
>
>>> The POMs also make a difference between "developers" which in this case
>
>>> mean EG Members and "contributors" which can be supporters of the JSR.
>
>>>
>
>>> Until JSR 364 is final offering other forms of participation e.g. as
>
>>> "contributor" (which the POM could probably reflect just like that) it
>
>>> means only EG Members can officially contribute to the JSR, but that is
>
>>> documented on the JCP page, I know a few JSRs that put the list into
>
>>> JavaDoc (e.g. MEEP 8) and we could copy the list of EG Members into the
>
>>> spec, too if we want.
>
>>>
>
>>> People outside the EG especially "prior contributions" would be tricky
>
>>> and problematic from an IP point of view. We're not allowed to take any
>
>>> random piece of code or advice into a Java standard.
>
>>>
>
>>> HTH,
>
>>> Werner
>
>>>
>
>>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Martin Desruisseaux <
>
>>>
>
>
>>> wrote:
>
>>>>
>
>>>> I stop for now (it is 3:20 AM on my side). Still have lot of open
>
>>>> issues, but hopefully should now be closer to the current API, have
>
>>>> less
>
>>>> invalid statements, and more formatting.
>
>>>>
>
>>>> Still, given the large amount of work by non-spec leaders (including
>
>>>> work inherited from JSR-275), would be nice if some sort of
>
>>>> acknowledgement were written somewhere in the document. I guess that in
>
>>>> other JSR the spec leader usually act as editors. In this case the
>
>>>> editor work has been largely done by non-spec leaders.
>
>>>>
>
>>>> Martin
>
>>>>
>
>>>>