Use Advanced Search to search the entire archive.
[jsr363-experts] Re: [VOTE] Artifact Name for ISO 80000 Module
- From: Werner Keil <
>
- To: "
" <
>
- Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: [VOTE] Artifact Name for ISO 80000 Module
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 13:35:34 +0200
Of course Java also uses common acronyms like "i18n", so please vote for
any of the now 3 options you prefer.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Werner Keil
<
>
wrote:
>
I thought
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO/IEC_80000#International_System_of_Quantities
>
stating
>
"The system of quantities, including the relations among the quantities
>
used as the basis of the units of the SI, is named the *International
>
System of Quantities*, denoted 'ISQ', in all languages."
>
would make ISQ clear and well defined by that standard for its users, but
>
hope to hear from others, especially 2 fellow Spec Leads or standard
>
veterans including Martin what they think.
>
I expect to meet him there, but hope I can present something under an
>
agreed name we concluded upon in Budapest already;-)
>
>
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Werner Keil
>
<
>
>
wrote:
>
>
> No dashes please, we'd have too many with other elements like version,
>
> etc. (like "<artifactId>-java8-X.Y" or similar;-) but if you want, let's
>
> assume your +1 for
>
> "iso80k" as another alternative.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Werner
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Chris Senior <
>
>
>
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> What about iso-80k?
>
>>
>
>> My main issue with iso80000 is the number of zeros (how may?) and the
>
>> lack of clear separation from the term "iso".
>
>>
>
>> isq is a bit cryptic for me.
>
>>
>
>> On 21 August 2015 at 09:27, Werner Keil
>
>> <
>
>
>> wrote:
>
>>
>
>>> +1 for "isq"
>
>>>
>
>>> It's shorter, and e.g. with a "-java8" postfix we're going to see more
>
>>> added to it, so keeping an "8" or "80000" out of the name sounds better.
>
>>>
>
>>> Werner
>
>>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>> --
>
>> Regards,
>
>>
>
>> Chris
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>