Skip to main content

[jsr363-experts] Re: Section 5 (Implementation): Range should move in the "example" section

  • From: Werner Keil < >
  • To: " " < >
  • Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: Section 5 (Implementation): Range should move in the "example" section
  • Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:18:11 +0100

The JSR detail page (https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=363) already
mentioned OGC Sensor Web Enablement among others as "underlying standards
and specifications".
JSR 256 as well as 310 have a Range "under the hood" but clearly part of
each Spec/API (it is in java.time.temporal, the "Spec" part of 310 though
it is almost impossible to tell where API ends and RI begins;-O)

We apply a pattern or "Spec" defined by OGC in that case, so I would not
deprive it by saying it's just an example.
What about other OCG specs, does GeoAPI call all of them "example"?;-)

It would be exactly the same case with Measurement btw.

Werner

On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Martin Desruisseaux <
>
 wrote:

> I don't see the point of detailing the "Range" class in the
> implementation section. It does not implement any of the JSR-363 API -
> it only use it. Can we move that to the "example" section?
>
>     Martin
>
>


[jsr363-experts] Section 5 (Implementation): Range should move in the "example" section

Martin Desruisseaux 12/17/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Section 5 (Implementation): Range should move in the "example" section

Werner Keil 12/17/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Section 5 (Implementation): Range should move in the "example" section

Martin Desruisseaux 12/17/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Section 5 (Implementation): Range should move in the "example" section

Werner Keil 12/17/2014
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close