Use Advanced Search to search the entire archive.
[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?
- From: Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>
- To:
- Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 00:17:31 +0100
Option 2
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Werner Keil
<
>
wrote:
>
Thanks. See some of you (Leo, Otavio in London, Mohamed in Nuremberg;-)
>
soon for a distributed "Euro F2F"
>
>
Just at Intel IoT Hackathon to do more hacking on Intel Edison.
>
>
Cheers,
>
>
Werner
>
>
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:38 AM, Personal Mail
>
<
>
>
wrote:
>
>
> Option 2
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> Mohamed Taman
>
>
>
> On Jun 13, 2015, at 12:21 AM, Leonardo Lima
>
> <
>
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> +1 for 2
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:08 PM Jean-Marie Dautelle
>
> <
>
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> +1 for 2
>
>>
>
>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Werner Keil
>
>> <
>
>
>> wrote:
>
>>
>
>>> Hi,
>
>>>
>
>>> Just to separate this from the name selection for (MassDensity), please
>
>>> advise on which of the "unnamed" Derived Quantities we'd like to keep in
>
>>> the API as opposed to other libraries (for all of SI, ISO, etc.)
>
>>>
>
>>>
>
>>> 1. Base Quantities + 22 "Named Quantities" (and Dimensionless) only
>
>>> (see
>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units#Base_units
>
>>> ,
>
>>>
>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units#Derived_units
>
>>> )
>
>>> 2. The above plus at most
>
>>> 1. Area
>
>>> 2. Volume
>
>>> 3. Speed
>
>>> 4. Acceleration
>
>>> 5. WaveNumber
>
>>> 6. Density
>
>>> 3. The above plus all of
>
>>>
>
>>> http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/si-brochure/section2-2.html#section2-2-1,
>
>>> even "exotic" ones like "refractive index"
>
>>>
>
>>> Please vote with a simple +1 for either 1, 2 or 3, no secondary choice.
>
>>> If 2 was selected we could figure out the exact number of quantities from
>
>>> that list in a second step.
>
>>>
>
>>> Thanks,
>
>>>
>
>>> Werner
>
>>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>> --
>
>> It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most
>
>> intelligent. It is the one that is most adaptable to change. - Darwin's
>
>> Origin of Species (digest)
>
>>
>
>
>
--
Otávio Gonçalves de Santana
blog:
http://otaviosantana.blogspot.com.br/
twitter:
http://twitter.com/otaviojava
site: *
http://about.me/otaviojava <
http://about.me/otaviojava>*