Use Advanced Search to search the entire archive.
[jsr363-experts] Re: PI
- From: Werner Keil <
>
- To: "
" <
>
- Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: PI
- Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 13:49:04 +0100
As mentioned, we could have a few days for "Spec cosmetic" but not only is
the actual code tagged as of this weekend (and I would rather defer changes
to the code to future stages than try to mess with that or publish new
JARs) but PMO naturally has a slight delay before they can really publish
the EDR we provide to them.
If we send it later than Mon or Tue nothing will happen before Christmas.
And most likely it may not even show up before the EC F2F. If we do a 30,
40 or 60 day review, that we are reasonably free to do. Not every user is a
field expert (like many in this EG) so I can't say, what "non-scientists"
both in the EC and wider community really care about in the spec. The API
is relatively small compared to even JSR 354 not to mention other bloated
ones like 310 (with almost 200 classes, just for time, even including all
the quantities we don't exceed 60;-D) so I thought 30 days should be enough.
Having it out when the EC meets would be good to know what we talk about
there;-)
Werner
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Martin Desruisseaux <
>
wrote:
>
>
Le 14/12/14 21:28, Werner Keil a écrit :
>
> We could try that for a further stage.
>
I agree with that. So let just keep in mind that an
>
implementation-independent SI class may be possible, but I agree that
>
trying to insert it now may be too risky.
>
>
Martin
>
>