Skip to main content

[jsr363-experts] Re: PI

  • From: Werner Keil < >
  • To: " " < >
  • Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: PI
  • Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 13:49:04 +0100

As mentioned, we could have a few days for "Spec cosmetic" but not only is
the actual code tagged as of this weekend (and I would rather defer changes
to the code to future stages than try to mess with that or publish new
JARs) but PMO naturally has a slight delay before they can really publish
the EDR we provide to them.

If we send it later than Mon or Tue nothing will happen before Christmas.
And most likely it may not even show up before the EC F2F. If we do a 30,
40 or 60 day review, that we are reasonably free to do. Not every user is a
field expert (like many in this EG) so I can't say, what "non-scientists"
both in the EC and wider community really care about in the spec. The API
is relatively small compared to even JSR 354 not to mention other bloated
ones like 310 (with almost 200 classes,  just for time, even including all
the quantities we don't exceed 60;-D) so I thought 30 days should be enough.

Having it out when the EC meets would be good to know what we talk about
there;-)

Werner

On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Martin Desruisseaux <
>
 wrote:
>
> Le 14/12/14 21:28, Werner Keil a écrit :
> > We could try that for a further stage.
> I agree with that. So let just keep in mind that an
> implementation-independent SI class may be possible, but I agree that
> trying to insert it now may be too risky.
>
>     Martin
>
>


[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

(continued)

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Martin Desruisseaux 12/13/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Werner Keil 12/13/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Werner Keil 12/13/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Martin Desruisseaux 12/14/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Werner Keil 12/14/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Martin Desruisseaux 12/14/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Werner Keil 12/14/2014

[jsr363-experts] PI

Martin Desruisseaux 12/14/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: PI

Werner Keil 12/14/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: PI

Martin Desruisseaux 12/14/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: PI

Werner Keil 12/14/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: PI

Werner Keil 12/17/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Leonardo Lima 12/16/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Martin Desruisseaux 12/16/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Leonardo Lima 12/16/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Martin Desruisseaux 12/16/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Werner Keil 12/16/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Leonardo Lima 12/16/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Werner Keil 12/16/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Leonardo Lima 12/16/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Werner Keil 12/16/2014
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close