Skip to main content

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

  • From: Werner Keil < >
  • To: " " < >
  • Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...
  • Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 20:42:18 +0200

Hoping to hear from GitBook users like Raj or Otavio, too..

Would you have a raking among those (both Mohamed and Chris)?

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Personal Mail 
< >
wrote:

> The same like Christopher
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> Mohamed Taman
>
> On Aug 3, 2015, at 7:40 PM, Chris Senior 
> < >
> wrote:
>
> +1 asciidoc or gitbook
>
> On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 14:10 Werner Keil 
> < >
>  wrote:
>
>> Dear Experts,
>>
>> About the task to factor out an RI guidline or tutorial
>https://java.net/jira/browse/UNITSOFMEASUREMENT-155
>>
>> I can't find Chris who suggested the separate document in JIRA, but
>> everyone is welcome to help with that. I have not created a GitBook from
>> scratch yet, but looking at the book Otavio started for JSR 354
>https://github.com/otaviojava/money-api-book even a separate repository
>> (it looks like you need that for GitBook?) with a descriptive name
>> (something like "unit-ri-guideline", "unit-ri-tutorial" etc.) actually
>> sounds quite appealing.
>>
>> Any preferences?
>> Please vote (either in the JIRA ticket or here) with +1 (or -1), not
>> voting would automatically be considered as "abstain" or "don't care"
>>
>>    - Asciidoc (similar to JSR 354)
>>    - Google Docs (separate document but like the Spec)
>>    - GitBook
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Werner
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Chris Senior (Google Docs) <
>
>> >
>> Date: Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:54 PM
>> Subject: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...
>>
>>
>> Chris Senior added a comment to JSR 363 Specification
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/12KhosAFriGCczBs6gwtJJDfg_QlANT92_lhxUWO2gCY/edit?disco=AAAAAdjU7mw>
>> [image: Chris Senior]
>> *Chris Senior*
>> RI level SPI
>>
>> Should this be in a separate document? I find it confusing that the API
>> spec talks about things that are not part of the API...
>> You received this email because you are subscribed to all discussions on 
>> JSR
>> 363 Specification
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/12KhosAFriGCczBs6gwtJJDfg_QlANT92_lhxUWO2gCY/edit?disco=AAAAAdjU7mw>
>> .Change what Google Docs sends you.
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/docos/notify?id=12KhosAFriGCczBs6gwtJJDfg_QlANT92_lhxUWO2gCY&title=JSR+363+Specification>You
>> can reply to this email to reply to the discussion.<logo.png>
>>
>>


[jsr363-experts] Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Werner Keil 08/03/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Chris Senior 08/03/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Werner Keil 08/03/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Personal Mail 08/03/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Werner Keil 08/03/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Werner Keil 08/05/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Martin Desruisseaux 08/05/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Werner Keil 08/05/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Werner Keil 08/17/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Werner Keil 08/26/2015
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close