Use Advanced Search to search the entire archive.
[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Chose name for "MassDensity"
- From: Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>
- To:
- Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Chose name for "MassDensity"
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 00:18:50 +0100
+1 for VolumetricMassDensity
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Werner Keil
<
>
wrote:
>
Dear Experts,
>
>
Sorry to bother you with this one again. Since it is just a single choice,
>
maybe we can close it sooner, so the quantity scope tasks can be finished
>
soon, too.
>
>
https://java.net/jira/browse/UNITSOFMEASUREMENT-9
>
Asks for either
>
>
1. MassDensity
>
2. VolumetricDensity
>
3. VolumetricMassDensity
>
>
Please advise with a +1 vote either in this thread or directly with the
>
JIRA ticket.
>
>
As discussed with Leo last weekend, there are a few manual steps required
>
on the ME side, so having the API and all types it contains frozen soon
>
would be beneficial for these steps, too.
>
I am not particularly biased. Having places like NIST and other standard
>
bodies just calling it "Mass Density" is probably a good argument. As
>
Wikipedia explains http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Density the proper full
>
name is "Volumetric Mass Density", so the name we had so far is one (maybe
>
a lesser used) short form. Either we keep it, use the more common one or
>
the full name.
>
>
Thanks,
>
>
>
Werner
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Otávio Gonçalves de Santana
blog:
http://otaviosantana.blogspot.com.br/
twitter:
http://twitter.com/otaviojava
site: *
http://about.me/otaviojava <
http://about.me/otaviojava>*