Skip to main content

[jsr363-experts] Re: PI

  • From: Werner Keil < >
  • To: " " < >
  • Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: PI
  • Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 18:59:51 +0100

Btw. looking at the CDI spec in one of CDI JSRs regular IRC chats, version
1.1 of CDI introduced one of the few classes in javax.enterprise.inject.spi
called CDI.
If we introduced any accessor class like SI into the API, then it probably
suited the javax.measure.spi package here, too.

SPI is already the only package with a secondary dependency ("format"
beside the root package) so having another dependency on pretty much every
interface in "quantity" would not be so tragic. Unlike CDI our SPI is
optional.

Werner


On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Werner Keil 
< >
 wrote:
>
> As mentioned, we could have a few days for "Spec cosmetic" but not only is
> the actual code tagged as of this weekend (and I would rather defer changes
> to the code to future stages than try to mess with that or publish new
> JARs) but PMO naturally has a slight delay before they can really publish
> the EDR we provide to them.
>
> If we send it later than Mon or Tue nothing will happen before Christmas.
> And most likely it may not even show up before the EC F2F. If we do a 30,
> 40 or 60 day review, that we are reasonably free to do. Not every user is a
> field expert (like many in this EG) so I can't say, what "non-scientists"
> both in the EC and wider community really care about in the spec. The API
> is relatively small compared to even JSR 354 not to mention other bloated
> ones like 310 (with almost 200 classes,  just for time, even including all
> the quantities we don't exceed 60;-D) so I thought 30 days should be enough.
>
> Having it out when the EC meets would be good to know what we talk about
> there;-)
>
> Werner
>
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Martin Desruisseaux <
>  >
>  wrote:
>>
>> Le 14/12/14 21:28, Werner Keil a écrit :
>> > We could try that for a further stage.
>> I agree with that. So let just keep in mind that an
>> implementation-independent SI class may be possible, but I agree that
>> trying to insert it now may be too risky.
>>
>>     Martin
>>
>>


[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

(continued)

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Werner Keil 12/13/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Werner Keil 12/13/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Martin Desruisseaux 12/14/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Werner Keil 12/14/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Martin Desruisseaux 12/14/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Werner Keil 12/14/2014

[jsr363-experts] PI

Martin Desruisseaux 12/14/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: PI

Werner Keil 12/14/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: PI

Martin Desruisseaux 12/14/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: PI

Werner Keil 12/14/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: PI

Werner Keil 12/17/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Leonardo Lima 12/16/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Martin Desruisseaux 12/16/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Leonardo Lima 12/16/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Martin Desruisseaux 12/16/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Werner Keil 12/16/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Leonardo Lima 12/16/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Werner Keil 12/16/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Leonardo Lima 12/16/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Werner Keil 12/16/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?

Werner Keil 12/16/2014
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close