Use Advanced Search to search the entire archive.
[jsr363-experts] Re: Quantity.doubleValue(...) ?
- From: Werner Keil <
>
- To: "
" <
>
- Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: Quantity.doubleValue(...) ?
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:03:45 +0100
Base Unit is a concrete class, but if you think the general concept of base
and derived units would better suit the API concepts and terms, please feel
free to refactor.
Those we declared only in the RI for now like Range or Measurement should
belong there, otherwise it creates the impression these are in the API.
Btw. what triggers the Unit-API JAR creation in the GeoAPI Maven repo? Is
that done manually?
I s
http://jcenter.bintray.com/javax/measure contains the new 0.7 API now
(beside the legacy 275 ones;-)
Here
http://maven.geotoolkit.org/javax/measure/unit-api/
is only 0.7-SNAPSHOT, but the master already moved to 0.8-SNAPSHOT allowing
later bugs to be addressed e.g. the one around QuantityFactory.
What causes the latest Snapshot to be delivered there, too?
And what about the 0.7 milestone release? You could either copy those
directly from JCenter or check out and build from the tag:
https://github.com/unitsofmeasurement/unit-api/releases/tag/0.7
UOM-Parent POM also has 2 new releases, one for EDR (it's in JCenter, but
especially if GeoAPI used only its own repositories it would be very
beneficial to have the right Parent POM for the RI and other artifacts) and
one for "Nightly" builds from master.
Especially the JCenter and Bintray provide excellent record of relevant Git
tags and everything else concerning each release.
It even tells us, the SE Port has been downloaded (mostly via Maven;-) 14
times since I published it yesterday:
https://bintray.com/unitsofmeasurement/maven/tec.uom:uom-se/view/statistics
and the RI at least twice:
https://bintray.com/unitsofmeasurement/maven/tec.units:unit-ri/view/statistics
Arguments like an old Sun one, that JSR-275 was not relevant or interesting
to the community seem quite old and outdated thanks to IoT, but with these
figures starting right now at EDR stage we can all see how often these are
retrieved at least via JCenter/Bintray;-)
Regards,
Werner
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Martin Desruisseaux <
>
wrote:
>
>
Le 15/12/14 20:37, Werner Keil a écrit :
>
> I fixed the only remaining sentence in the spec where
>
> doubleValue(Unit) etc. were still mentioned in the context of the API
>
> Quantity.
>
> Also moved some footnote into the RI level AbstractQuantity. Please
>
> remove if you feel it no longer matters.
>
>
Thanks, I will think about the footnote. Conversely, I'm also wondering
>
if some part of the "implementation" chapter should move closer to the
>
API or general discussion part. For example the definition of terms in
>
the implementation chapter actually define terms that are actually not
>
implementation-specific (e.g. the "base unit" and "derived unit" part -
>
this is not an implementation details, since those concept are precisely
>
defined by BIPM).
>
>
Martin
>
>