Skip to main content

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

  • From: Martin Desruisseaux < >
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship
  • Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 01:26:37 +0900
  • Organization: Geomatys

Le 02/11/14 01:21, Martin Desruisseaux a écrit :
> So that point that I'm trying to make is that it is a matter of how
> *we, the JSR-363* group, choose to define Quantity. The current spec
> clearly restrict the definition to quantitative measurement, which I
> think is a legitimate restriction provided that we provide a clear
> definition.

Before you told me "we need to support non-quantitative values" (I
really have to go sleep): okay, maybe, but this brings us back to my
original request: please lets agree on definition on terms, and write
them down, before to continue this discussion any further.

Now I close my email client - really need to go sleep.

    Martin



Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

(continued)

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Werner Keil 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Werner Keil 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Martin Desruisseaux 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Werner Keil 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Werner Keil 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Martin Desruisseaux 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Werner Keil 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Martin Desruisseaux 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Werner Keil 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Martin Desruisseaux 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Martin Desruisseaux 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Werner Keil 11/01/2014
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close