Use Advanced Search to search the entire archive.
[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...
- From: Werner Keil <
>
- To: "
" <
>
- Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...
- Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 19:45:21 +0200
Since it supports the RI but could be seen as a separate entity and
repository, i'd even say
+1 Gitbook.
It seems fine to me allowing "Adopters" or any yet to be defined team/role
to contribute to that document.
Asciidoc as JSR 354 included it in the RI repository is only open to EG
members by our IP standards (for uom-se that's a different story, but API,
RI and TCK are more restricted. having said that, I guess if we hope to
contribute some or all of uom-se to some "jdk.uom" project in the near
future, everyone who touches code there should be required to sign the OCA
or JSPA first, too;-)
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Chris Senior
<
>
wrote:
>
+1 asciidoc or gitbook
>
>
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 14:10 Werner Keil
>
<
>
>
wrote:
>
>
> Dear Experts,
>
>
>
> About the task to factor out an RI guidline or tutorial
>
> https://java.net/jira/browse/UNITSOFMEASUREMENT-155
>
>
>
> I can't find Chris who suggested the separate document in JIRA, but
>
> everyone is welcome to help with that. I have not created a GitBook from
>
> scratch yet, but looking at the book Otavio started for JSR 354
>
> https://github.com/otaviojava/money-api-book even a separate repository
>
> (it looks like you need that for GitBook?) with a descriptive name
>
> (something like "unit-ri-guideline", "unit-ri-tutorial" etc.) actually
>
> sounds quite appealing.
>
>
>
> Any preferences?
>
> Please vote (either in the JIRA ticket or here) with +1 (or -1), not
>
> voting would automatically be considered as "abstain" or "don't care"
>
>
>
> - Asciidoc (similar to JSR 354)
>
> - Google Docs (separate document but like the Spec)
>
> - GitBook
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Werner
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>
> From: Chris Senior (Google Docs) <
>
>
>
> >
>
> Date: Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:54 PM
>
> Subject: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...
>
>
>
>
>
> Chris Senior added a comment to JSR 363 Specification
>
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/12KhosAFriGCczBs6gwtJJDfg_QlANT92_lhxUWO2gCY/edit?disco=AAAAAdjU7mw>
>
> [image: Chris Senior]
>
> *Chris Senior*
>
> RI level SPI
>
>
>
> Should this be in a separate document? I find it confusing that the API
>
> spec talks about things that are not part of the API...
>
> You received this email because you are subscribed to all discussions on
>
> JSR
>
> 363 Specification
>
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/12KhosAFriGCczBs6gwtJJDfg_QlANT92_lhxUWO2gCY/edit?disco=AAAAAdjU7mw>
>
> .Change what Google Docs sends you.
>
> <https://docs.google.com/document/docos/notify?id=12KhosAFriGCczBs6gwtJJDfg_QlANT92_lhxUWO2gCY&title=JSR+363+Specification>You
>
> can reply to this email to reply to the discussion.
>
>
>
>
