Skip to main content

Re: Email proposal to the core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net

  • From: Werner Keil < >
  • To: " " < >
  • Subject: Re: Email proposal to the
  • Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:19:52 +0100

All,

If any, I think we should send a new one. However, asking the majority of
JDK core folks about a scientific/mathematical problem (which in the end it
always is) would be like asking them about EJBs or Servlets[?]

I don't want to bother them too much, but given the Eclipse science-wg
mailing list is packed with domain experts beyond those who already said
the current signature is absolutely fine to them in 363, and at least one
project under Science already includes JSR 275 since that is available
under Orbit/Eclipse since uDig (LocationTech) put it there. They all use
especially the Unit type in the current (JSR 275/Unit-API 0.6) form, so
like Martin/GeoAPI they should have their experience and if they think
something could be changed or improved, they'll tell.

This week was EclipseCon Europe, I think it ends no later than today, so
allowing them to return seems good, but if you want to think of something
(English there, only a few on science.eclipse.org are German Speakers) I'm
happy to ask the mailing list for their advice.
They are real users, and some already use prior APIs, so asking them sounds
better, they are also experts in Areas like math, science or IoT rather
than simply those building compilers[?]

Regards,
Werner

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Martin Desruisseaux <
>
 wrote:

> Hello Otavio
>
> Le 30/10/14 16:47, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana a écrit :
> > Thank you to explain Martin, but I don't feel comfortable when you use
> > an API in Java SE before 1.6 to explain Generics uses. I believe you
> > did not send the email to Core asking about the API.
> > If you mind, I send an email explain all context? This way the core
> > team can help us.
> I didn't sent the email, but I fully support sending one if that can
> help. Lets agree about the email on this mailing list first. Do we use
> my previous draft as a starting point, or do you want to write a new one?
>
>     Martin
>
>

Attachment: 329.gif
Description: GIF image

Attachment: 347.gif
Description: GIF image



Re: Email proposal to the

(continued)

Re: Email proposal to the

Martin Desruisseaux 10/21/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Werner Keil 10/21/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Werner Keil 10/21/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Otávio Gonçalves de Santana 10/28/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Werner Keil 10/28/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Martin Desruisseaux 10/29/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Werner Keil 10/29/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Otávio Gonçalves de Santana 10/30/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Werner Keil 10/30/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Martin Desruisseaux 10/30/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Werner Keil 10/30/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Martin Desruisseaux 10/30/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Werner Keil 10/30/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Martin Desruisseaux 10/30/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Werner Keil 10/30/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Otávio Gonçalves de Santana 10/31/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Werner Keil 10/31/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Werner Keil 10/19/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Leonardo Lima 10/19/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Werner Keil 10/19/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Martin Desruisseaux 10/20/2014
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close