Skip to main content

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

  • From: "Legrand, Karen" < >
  • To: " " < >
  • Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?
  • Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:10:29 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US

+1 for Option 2

From: Werner Keil 
[mailto: ]
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 10:49 AM
To: 

Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to 
keep in API?

Dear Experts,

Any thoughts on this?

I take Martin's reply in the thread on naming (Mass)Density that he feels 
comfortable with option 2 as well.
Formal confirmation appreciated, but so far this would make 2 votes for 
option 2.

Thanks,
Werner

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Werner Keil 
< <mailto: >>
 wrote:
+1 for 2.

I would keep at the very least Area, Volume and Speed, a few others likely 
(though I'm not so sure about WaveNumber)

Regards,
Werner








On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Werner Keil 
< <mailto: >>
 wrote:
Hi,

Just to separate this from the name selection for (MassDensity), please 
advise on which of the "unnamed" Derived Quantities we'd like to keep in the 
API as opposed to other libraries (for all of SI, ISO, etc.)


  1.  Base Quantities + 22 "Named Quantities" (and Dimensionless) only (see 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units#Base_units, ;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units#Derived_units)
  2.  The above plus at most
1.      Area
2.      Volume
3.      Speed
4.      Acceleration
5.      WaveNumber
6.      Density

  1.  The above plus all of 
http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/si-brochure/section2-2.html#section2-2-1, ;
even "exotic" ones like "refractive index"
Please vote with a simple +1 for either 1, 2 or 3, no secondary choice. If 2 
was selected we could figure out the exact number of quantities from that 
list in a second step.

Thanks,


Werner




[jsr363-experts] [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Werner Keil 06/09/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Werner Keil 06/10/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Werner Keil 06/12/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Legrand, Karen 06/15/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Werner Keil 06/15/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Jean-Marie Dautelle 06/12/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Leonardo Lima 06/12/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Personal Mail 06/12/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Werner Keil 06/13/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Otávio Gonçalves de Santana 06/14/2015
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close