Use Advanced Search to search the entire archive.
[jsr363-experts] Re: Road to Final Draft
- From: Werner Keil <
>
- To: "
" <
>
- Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: Road to Final Draft
- Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 20:32:07 +0100
Please try again. I tried to adjust the duration and it seems that closed
it. Thanks for your vote. Although JSR 354 does have multiple singletons,
one is called Bootstrap, too, it might offer a similar feeling. Let's see
what everyone says.
Werner
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:33 PM, Jean-Marie Dautelle
<
>
wrote:
>
Hi Werner,
>
The poll is closed. My preference would be to keep it Bootstrap.
>
Thanks,
>
>
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Werner Keil
>
<
>
>
wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> While the other suggested changes are usually quite clear (e.g. the
>
> method in Unit) I created a Doodle for the Bootstrap class:
>
> http://doodle.com/poll/rgwqcdz6u9c3rp7pgue9d9mw/admin#table
>
> You also got an invitation, did not send it to the mailing list, so all
>
> EG members (doing that in a wider group may be a bit complicated, plus it's
>
> an API aspect so only the EG should decide in the end) can vote.
>
>
>
> Please vote if you care, the existing name is also an option. It seems
>
> multiple choices are possible, even if you can't decide for one we should
>
> get a result for the most popular choice.
>
> I'd say the doodle is open for at least a week from now.
>
>
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Werner
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Jean-Marie Dautelle
>
> <
>
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> Hi Werner and All,
>
>> I will be happy to meet you for a beer if you come to the EclipseCon or
>
>> the Unconference in Toulouse :)
>
>> Cheers,
>
>> Jean-Marie
>
>>
>
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Werner Keil
>
>> <
>
>
>> wrote:
>
>>
>
>>> Dear Experts,
>
>>>
>
>>> Please have a look at open issues for this iteration which as it stands
>
>>> now should result in a Final Draft of JSR 363:
>
>>> https://java.net/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=12&view=planning
>
>>> Out of currently 27 issues a little over 50% are still open.
>
>>>
>
>>> IMHO we should get structural decisions done before a Final Draft to
>
>>> get the API stable and ready for a Final release (Final Draft is often
>
>>> pretty identical to what becomes Final soon after)
>
>>>
>
>>> Renaming Bootstrap (or not) as well as changes like getProductUnits()
>
>>> in the Unit type.
>
>>>
>
>>> The Final Draft is intended in late Spring, right now with June 30 as
>
>>> target date. There is no ballot until the Final Approval, so the review
>
>>> period lasts till Final Approval Ballot is initiated.
>
>>>
>
>>> If Jean-Marie has time to participate again, I could meet him in June
>
>>> around EclipseCon France:
>
>>> https://www.eclipsecon.org/france2016/
>
>>> At the very least the Unconference (which is on a Friday now, that
>
>>> makes it easier to go back on a weekend;-) which had a focus on Science
>
>>> or
>
>>> Automotive (subject of current customer project) in the past beside
>
>>> PolarSys due to Airbus and the Embedded industry involved. Should a talk
>
>>> which I may propose be accepted, I'd stay longer, otherwise I don't think
>
>>> the client project would like me to go more than a day for the
>
>>> Unconference.
>
>>>
>
>>> Goal is to get Final before JavaOne, it seems reasonable based on what
>
>>> we got, especially Almas' contribution to the TCK. Another (German
>
>>> speaking) event will be Munich next month and since it's a Saturday I
>
>>> also
>
>>> plan to visit Global IoT Day in Zurich again. I also proposed a talk to
>
>>> Java Forum Stuttgart. Let's see, if they like it, would be a chance for
>
>>> further feedback during the Final Draft period.
>
>>>
>
>>> Regards,
>
>>>
>
>>> Werner Keil | JCP Executive Committee Member, JSR 363 Co Spec Lead |
>
>>> Eclipse UOMo Lead, Babel Language Champion | Apache Committer
>
>>>
>
>>> Twitter @wernerkeil | @UnitAPI | @JSR354 | @AgoravaProj | @DeviceMap
>
>>> | #DevOps | #EclipseUOMo
>
>>> Skype werner.keil | Google+ gplus.to/wernerkeil
>
>>>
>
>>>
>
>>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>> --
>
>> It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most
>
>> intelligent. It is the one that is most adaptable to change. - Darwin's
>
>> Origin of Species (digest)
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
>
It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most
>
intelligent. It is the one that is most adaptable to change. - Darwin's
>
Origin of Species (digest)
>