Skip to main content

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

  • From: Chris Senior < >
  • To: " " < >
  • Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...
  • Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:40:06 +0000

+1 asciidoc or gitbook

On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 14:10 Werner Keil 
< >
 wrote:

> Dear Experts,
>
> About the task to factor out an RI guidline or tutorial
> https://java.net/jira/browse/UNITSOFMEASUREMENT-155
>
> I can't find Chris who suggested the separate document in JIRA, but
> everyone is welcome to help with that. I have not created a GitBook from
> scratch yet, but looking at the book Otavio started for JSR 354
> https://github.com/otaviojava/money-api-book even a separate repository
> (it looks like you need that for GitBook?) with a descriptive name
> (something like "unit-ri-guideline", "unit-ri-tutorial" etc.) actually
> sounds quite appealing.
>
> Any preferences?
> Please vote (either in the JIRA ticket or here) with +1 (or -1), not
> voting would automatically be considered as "abstain" or "don't care"
>
>    - Asciidoc (similar to JSR 354)
>    - Google Docs (separate document but like the Spec)
>    - GitBook
>
> Thanks,
>
> Werner
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Chris Senior (Google Docs) <
> 
> >
> Date: Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:54 PM
> Subject: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...
>
>
> Chris Senior added a comment to JSR 363 Specification
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/12KhosAFriGCczBs6gwtJJDfg_QlANT92_lhxUWO2gCY/edit?disco=AAAAAdjU7mw>
> [image: Chris Senior]
> *Chris Senior*
> RI level SPI
>
> Should this be in a separate document? I find it confusing that the API
> spec talks about things that are not part of the API...
> You received this email because you are subscribed to all discussions on JSR
> 363 Specification
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/12KhosAFriGCczBs6gwtJJDfg_QlANT92_lhxUWO2gCY/edit?disco=AAAAAdjU7mw>
> .Change what Google Docs sends you.
> <https://docs.google.com/document/docos/notify?id=12KhosAFriGCczBs6gwtJJDfg_QlANT92_lhxUWO2gCY&title=JSR+363+Specification>You
> can reply to this email to reply to the discussion.
>
>

PNG image



[jsr363-experts] Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Werner Keil 08/03/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Chris Senior 08/03/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Werner Keil 08/03/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Personal Mail 08/03/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Werner Keil 08/03/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Werner Keil 08/05/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Martin Desruisseaux 08/05/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Werner Keil 08/05/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Werner Keil 08/17/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Werner Keil 08/26/2015
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close