Use Advanced Search to search the entire archive.
[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?
- From: Werner Keil <
>
- To: "
" <
>
- Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?
- Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 17:49:00 +0200
Dear Experts,
Any thoughts on this?
I take Martin's reply in the thread on naming (Mass)Density that he feels
comfortable with option 2 as well.
Formal confirmation appreciated, but so far this would make 2 votes for
option 2.
Thanks,
Werner
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Werner Keil
<
>
wrote:
>
+1 for 2.
>
>
I would keep at the very least Area, Volume and Speed, a few others likely
>
(though I'm not so sure about WaveNumber)
>
>
Regards,
>
Werner
>
>
>
>
>
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Werner Keil
>
<
>
>
wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Just to separate this from the name selection for (MassDensity), please
>
> advise on which of the "unnamed" Derived Quantities we'd like to keep in
>
> the API as opposed to other libraries (for all of SI, ISO, etc.)
>
>
>
>
>
> 1. Base Quantities + 22 "Named Quantities" (and Dimensionless) only
>
> (see
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units#Base_units
>
> ,
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units#Derived_units
>
> )
>
> 2. The above plus at most
>
> 1. Area
>
> 2. Volume
>
> 3. Speed
>
> 4. Acceleration
>
> 5. WaveNumber
>
> 6. Density
>
> 3. The above plus all of
>
>
>
> http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/si-brochure/section2-2.html#section2-2-1,
>
> even "exotic" ones like "refractive index"
>
>
>
> Please vote with a simple +1 for either 1, 2 or 3, no secondary choice.
>
> If 2 was selected we could figure out the exact number of quantities from
>
> that list in a second step.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Werner
>
>
>
>