Skip to main content

[jsr363-experts] Re: Would like a delay for the early draft

  • From: Werner Keil < >
  • To: " " < >
  • Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: Would like a delay for the early draft
  • Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:54:51 +0100

That's exactly the issue, our follow-up number JSR 364 lead by Heather
hopes to address.
You have always been an Individual EG Member, so IP contributions even if
Geomatys may have signed your Exhibit B are considered to be your own.
At the moment this is the case for all EG Members except V2COM.

If Adrian is no longer there I guess the only way we could honor his input
is via a POM like
https://github.com/unitsofmeasurement/uom-parent/blob/master/pom.xml
There under "Contributors" a few key contributors to earlier efforts
especially Unit-API 0.6 are mentioned, e.g Paul who was extremely helpful
with some of the unit tests and related test classes.

If you can think of a meaningful role (not "Developer") for Adrian, please
feel free to add him under contributors (ideally in the parent POM, the few
people also mentioned in the API POM were all listed as "Supporter" of JSR
363)

I can't think of too many paragraphs that would so drastically differ or
contain legacy of more than a sentence or word (e.g. the infamous "Unit
class", etc. but I replaced all I came across completely) but if you see
anything, please either delete that sentence if it won't be addressed even
in future stages of the JSR or make a comment in Google Docs. Mostly Leo
and I did that a lot. For things like UML or chapters that did not even
exist before like Quantity arithmetics I solved these by updating the spec.

HTH,
Werner

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Martin Desruisseaux <
>
 wrote:
>
> Le 15/12/14 18:33, Werner Keil a écrit :
> >
> > Not that I'm aware of. Unless Adrian joined the EG, too especially for
> > the Spec this is a very delicate issue, See JSR 364;-)
> >
> At that time, Adrian was a Geomatys employee like myself. He was sitting
> on my left side in the office and helped me a lot when we spent weeks of
> Geomatys paid time writing JSR-275. But I also remember with high
> confidence (as a JSR-275 editor who incorporated those discussions in
> the spec) that many paragraphs were elaborated by long discussions on
> the mailing list with other members.
>
> Now I'm reviewing the specification and comparing with the actual API,
> and frankly I don't feel like such review has been done seriously
> before. The specification which was about to be submitted was not about
> JSR-363, but about a non-existent API somewhere between JSR-108, JSR-275
> and JSR-363. My emails are only about the less trivial issues - the
> trivial ones were fixed directly.
>
>     Martin
>
>


[jsr363-experts] Would like a delay for the early draft

Martin Desruisseaux 12/14/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Would like a delay for the early draft

Werner Keil 12/14/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Would like a delay for the early draft

Jean-Marie Dautelle 12/14/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Would like a delay for the early draft

Werner Keil 12/14/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Would like a delay for the early draft

Martin Desruisseaux 12/15/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Would like a delay for the early draft

Werner Keil 12/15/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Would like a delay for the early draft

Martin Desruisseaux 12/15/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Would like a delay for the early draft

Werner Keil 12/15/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Would like a delay for the early draft

Martin Desruisseaux 12/16/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Would like a delay for the early draft

Leonardo Lima 12/16/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Would like a delay for the early draft

Werner Keil 12/16/2014

[jsr363-experts] Re: Would like a delay for the early draft

Martin Desruisseaux 12/15/2014
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close