Use Advanced Search to search the entire archive.
[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?
- From: Leonardo Lima <
>
- To: "
" <
>
- Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 08:27:26 -0200
I guess if we have each as a class under an optional package, it would be
ok.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Martin Desruisseaux <
>
wrote:
>
>
Le 16/12/14 19:02, Leonardo Lima a écrit :
>
> I'm just afraid of the RAM cost for this exposure, as we do have small
>
> systems. Again, the main concern is RAM usage, not Flash storage. So
>
> the API can be "big" in .jar size, but using one or two classes
>
> mustn't cause it to use a lot of RAM.
>
>
Are we allowed to declare that each individual member of the SI class is
>
optional? E.g. could an implementation omit all SI constants except
>
METRE and SECOND for example? It would be my preferred path if we are
>
allowed to.
>
>
Martin
>
>