Use Advanced Search to search the entire archive.
[jsr363-experts] Re: Should we rename Bootstrap?
- From: Werner Keil <
>
- To: "
" <
>
- Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: Should we rename Bootstrap?
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:54:33 +0200
What I found convincing is the option of a simplified mandatory service
definition as seen in
https://github.com/keilw/si-units/tree/master/units/src/main/resources/META-INF/services
Reducing the number from up to 3 (if you want to expose/override every type
of service) to 1 in most cases.
And it makes the ServiceProvider the central SPI element similar to
https://json-processing-spec.java.net/nonav/releases/1.0/fcs/javadocs/javax/json/spi/JsonProvider.html
.
Especially for Quantities it's worth asking if not to go further and expose
QuantityFactory directly via a getQuantityFactory() or
createQuantityFactory() method. All other services have multiple methods
and e.g. for modules that return say USCustomary, Imperial or other unit
systems in a single service, it is valid to have a "default" and "get
available" method, but at least for QuantityFactory we so far have just one
and could further simplify the SPI by merging QuantityFactoryService and
QuantityFactory ;-)
But one step at a time.
Regards,
Werner
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Werner Keil
<
>
wrote:
>
So for the record, even with Otavio's last minute choice, we'd be at
>
>
>
- Something else (aka merging Bootstrap into ServiceProvider as
>
demonstrated by Martin's PoC) 4
>
- Bootstrap (don't change) 3
>
- UoM 1
>
>
>
If anybody else in the EG has a strong preference for either approach,
>
please say so ASAP. As soon as Martin's PR was merged into master, the
>
decision would be made based on current votes.
>
>
Thanks,
>
Werner
>
>
>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
>
From: Otávio Gonçalves de Santana
>
<
>
>
Date: 2016-03-31 12:32 GMT+02:00
>
Subject: Re: Should we rename Bootstrap?
>
To: Werner Keil
>
<
>
>
>
>
Hi Werner.
>
I cannot change.
>
But my option is: Bootstrap (no change)
>
>
2016-03-30 19:42 GMT-03:00 Werner Keil (via Doodle)
>
<
>:
>
>
> Werner Keil hat die Doodle-Umfrage "Should we rename Bootstrap?"
>
> abgeschlossen
>
>
>
> <https://doodle.com/?tmail=poll_invitecontact_participant_finalpick&tlink=logo>
>
>
>
> Hallo OtávioGonçalvesdeSantana,
>
>
>
> Werner Keil hat die folgende Option in der Umfrage “Should we rename
>
> Bootstrap?” ausgewählt:
>
> *Something else (please suggest in JIRA)*
>
> Zur Umfrage
>
> <https://doodle.com/poll/rgwqcdz6u9c3rp7pp5rppumb/private?tmail=poll_invitecontact_participant_finalpick&tlink=pollbtn>
>
> Sie erhalten diese E-Mail, weil "Werner Keil" Sie zur Doodle-Umfrage
>
> "Should we rename Bootstrap?" eingeladen hat.
>
> Bitte beachten Sie, dass dies eine persönliche Einladung ist, die nicht
>
> mit anderen Umfrageteilnehmenden geteilt werden kann.
>
>
>
> Doodle ist auch für iOS sowie Android verfügbar.
>
> <https://app.adjust.io/9wf3k9> <https://app.adjust.com/sxd4md>
>
> Doodle AG, Werdstrasse 21, 8021 Zürich
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
>
Otávio Gonçalves de Santana
>
>
>
twitter: http://twitter.com/otaviojava
>
site: *http://about.me/otaviojava <http://about.me/otaviojava>*
>
>
>