Skip to main content

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

  • From: Martin Desruisseaux < >
  • To:
  • Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...
  • Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 12:24:22 +0200
  • Organization: Geomatys

Le 05/08/15 11:55, Werner Keil a écrit :
> Just a quick reminder if you have a preference towards format of a "RI
> guide"?
>
> As of now, we have 
>
>   * 3 votes for Gitbook
>   * 2 votes for Asciidoc
>

No preference between those two on my side.

In the past I have used extensively Maven APT, Docbook, Markdown and
others, and came to the conclusion that it was better to write directly
in HTML 5 for our documentation. But not all documentation have the same
needs.

    Martin



[jsr363-experts] Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Werner Keil 08/03/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Chris Senior 08/03/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Werner Keil 08/03/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Personal Mail 08/03/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Werner Keil 08/03/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Werner Keil 08/05/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Martin Desruisseaux 08/05/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Werner Keil 08/05/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Werner Keil 08/17/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...

Werner Keil 08/26/2015
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close