Skip to main content

Re: Email proposal to the core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net

  • From: Martin Desruisseaux < >
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: Email proposal to the
  • Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:13:18 +0900
  • Organization: Geomatys

Le 20/10/14 06:33, Leonardo Lima a écrit :
> We all but Werner would NOT like the "new signature", we (Leo, Otávio,
> Martin and Jean-Marie) understood it breaks some rules and logic.
> Still, that doesn't solve some other problems and raises other
> questions like "should we remove the operation or not", but *that's
> for another mail thread and JIRA issue*. JIRA #62 (and that mail
> thread) is about changing the signature method. 
This is fair. Waiting for the new JIRA issue.

What about the email to the OpenJDK list? Should we send it anyway
(after edition for the feedbacks sent on this list) for making very
clear that any method signature that break parameter type safety that
way can not be applied, no matter what any of us or Eclipse IoT said? Or
do we abandon that email?

    Martin



Re: Email proposal to the

(continued)

Re: Email proposal to the

Werner Keil 10/20/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Werner Keil 10/20/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Otávio Gonçalves de Santana 10/20/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Werner Keil 10/20/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Martin Desruisseaux 10/20/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Werner Keil 10/20/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Otávio Gonçalves de Santana 10/20/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Werner Keil 10/20/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Martin Desruisseaux 10/20/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Werner Keil 10/19/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Martin Desruisseaux 10/20/2014

Re: Email proposal to the

Martin Desruisseaux 10/20/2014
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close