Use Advanced Search to search the entire archive.
[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?
- From: Werner Keil <
>
- To: "
" <
>
- Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 16:18:50 +0100
Thanks, it seems almost everyone voted, at least a majority of 6 (with
Martin's reply earlier as 7) votes of 9 EG members.
Will mark all other quantities @Deprecated and a Q2 release (0.8-RC3) of
the API should contain only those we plan to include by the end of this
month.
Regards,
Werner
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Legrand, Karen
<
>
wrote:
>
+1 for Option 2
>
>
>
>
*From:* Werner Keil
>
[mailto:
]
>
*Sent:* Friday, June 12, 2015 10:49 AM
>
*To:*
>
>
*Subject:* [jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities
>
to keep in API?
>
>
>
>
Dear Experts,
>
>
>
>
Any thoughts on this?
>
>
>
>
I take Martin's reply in the thread on naming (Mass)Density that he feels
>
comfortable with option 2 as well.
>
>
Formal confirmation appreciated, but so far this would make 2 votes for
>
option 2.
>
>
>
>
Thanks,
>
>
Werner
>
>
>
>
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Werner Keil
>
<
>
>
wrote:
>
>
+1 for 2.
>
>
>
>
I would keep at the very least Area, Volume and Speed, a few others likely
>
(though I'm not so sure about WaveNumber)
>
>
>
>
Regards,
>
>
Werner
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Werner Keil
>
<
>
>
wrote:
>
>
Hi,
>
>
>
>
Just to separate this from the name selection for (MassDensity), please
>
advise on which of the "unnamed" Derived Quantities we'd like to keep in
>
the API as opposed to other libraries (for all of SI, ISO, etc.)
>
>
>
>
1. Base Quantities + 22 "Named Quantities" (and Dimensionless) only
>
(see
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units#Base_units,
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units#Derived_units
>
)
>
2. The above plus at most
>
>
1. Area
>
>
2. Volume
>
>
3. Speed
>
>
4. Acceleration
>
>
5. WaveNumber
>
>
6. Density
>
>
1. The above plus all of
>
>
http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/si-brochure/section2-2.html#section2-2-1,
>
even "exotic" ones like "refractive index"
>
>
Please vote with a simple +1 for either 1, 2 or 3, no secondary choice.
>
If 2 was selected we could figure out the exact number of quantities from
>
that list in a second step.
>
>
>
>
Thanks,
>
>
>
Werner
>
>
>
>
>