Skip to main content

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

  • From: Werner Keil < >
  • To: " " < >
  • Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?
  • Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 17:49:00 +0200

Dear Experts,

Any thoughts on this?

I take Martin's reply in the thread on naming (Mass)Density that he feels
comfortable with option 2 as well.
Formal confirmation appreciated, but so far this would make 2 votes for
option 2.

Thanks,
Werner

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Werner Keil 
< >
 wrote:

> +1 for 2.
>
> I would keep at the very least Area, Volume and Speed, a few others likely
> (though I'm not so sure about WaveNumber)
>
> Regards,
> Werner
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Werner Keil 
> < >
>  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just to separate this from the name selection for (MassDensity), please
>> advise on which of the "unnamed" Derived Quantities we'd like to keep in
>> the API as opposed to other libraries (for all of SI, ISO, etc.)
>>
>>
>>    1. Base Quantities + 22 "Named Quantities" (and Dimensionless) only
>>    (see
>>    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units#Base_units
>>    ,
>>    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units#Derived_units
>>    )
>>    2. The above plus at most
>>       1. Area
>>       2. Volume
>>       3. Speed
>>       4. Acceleration
>>       5. WaveNumber
>>       6. Density
>>    3. The above plus all of
>>    
>http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/si-brochure/section2-2.html#section2-2-1,
>>    even "exotic" ones like "refractive index"
>>
>> Please vote with a simple +1 for either 1, 2 or 3, no secondary choice.
>> If 2 was selected we could figure out the exact number of quantities from
>> that list in a second step.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Werner
>>
>
>


[jsr363-experts] [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Werner Keil 06/09/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Werner Keil 06/10/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Werner Keil 06/12/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Legrand, Karen 06/15/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Werner Keil 06/15/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Jean-Marie Dautelle 06/12/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Leonardo Lima 06/12/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Personal Mail 06/12/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Werner Keil 06/13/2015

[jsr363-experts] Re: [Vote] Which "unnamed" Derived Quantities to keep in API?

Otávio Gonçalves de Santana 06/14/2015
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close