Use Advanced Search to search the entire archive.
[jsr363-experts] Re: [VOTE] Artifact Name for ISO 80000 Module
- From: Werner Keil <
>
- To: "
" <
>
- Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: [VOTE] Artifact Name for ISO 80000 Module
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 13:26:28 +0200
I thought
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO/IEC_80000#International_System_of_Quantities
stating
"The system of quantities, including the relations among the quantities
used as the basis of the units of the SI, is named the *International
System of Quantities*, denoted 'ISQ', in all languages."
would make ISQ clear and well defined by that standard for its users, but
hope to hear from others, especially 2 fellow Spec Leads or standard
veterans including Martin what they think.
I expect to meet him there, but hope I can present something under an
agreed name we concluded upon in Budapest already;-)
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Werner Keil
<
>
wrote:
>
No dashes please, we'd have too many with other elements like version,
>
etc. (like "<artifactId>-java8-X.Y" or similar;-) but if you want, let's
>
assume your +1 for
>
"iso80k" as another alternative.
>
>
Thanks,
>
>
Werner
>
>
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Chris Senior <
>
>
>
wrote:
>
>
> What about iso-80k?
>
>
>
> My main issue with iso80000 is the number of zeros (how may?) and the
>
> lack of clear separation from the term "iso".
>
>
>
> isq is a bit cryptic for me.
>
>
>
> On 21 August 2015 at 09:27, Werner Keil
>
> <
>
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> +1 for "isq"
>
>>
>
>> It's shorter, and e.g. with a "-java8" postfix we're going to see more
>
>> added to it, so keeping an "8" or "80000" out of the name sounds better.
>
>>
>
>> Werner
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>