Skip to main content

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

  • From: Werner Keil < >
  • To: " " < >
  • Subject: Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship
  • Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 17:05:27 +0100

However, it would pretty much mess up the Q part, not to mention the
"quantity" package if we hide it or have all these types extend Measurement
(which would avoid the circular reference)

 Werner Keil
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Martin Desruisseaux <
>
 wrote:

>  Le 02/11/14 00:52, Jean-Marie Dautelle a écrit :
>
> > Mass mass = myObject.getMass();
>
>  If you want to do that (which is possible) you will need Mass (hence
> Quantity) to provide some useful value/unit pair.
> Otherwise, I don't know what you would do with Mass !!
> This goes back to proposition #1
>
> I would rather said to proposition #4: keep current hierarchy as it stand
> today, if we accept to define Quantity as a "quantitative measurement" (I'm
> fine with renaming Quantity if needed).
>
>     Martin
>
>


Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

(continued)

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Werner Keil 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Martin Desruisseaux 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Werner Keil 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Martin Desruisseaux 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Werner Keil 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Martin Desruisseaux 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Werner Keil 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Martin Desruisseaux 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Jean-Marie Dautelle 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Martin Desruisseaux 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Werner Keil 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Werner Keil 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Martin Desruisseaux 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Werner Keil 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Werner Keil 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Martin Desruisseaux 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Werner Keil 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Martin Desruisseaux 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Werner Keil 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Martin Desruisseaux 11/01/2014

Re: On Quantity - Measurement relationship

Martin Desruisseaux 11/01/2014
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close