Use Advanced Search to search the entire archive.
[jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?
- From: Werner Keil <
>
- To: "
" <
>
- Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: Should JSR-363 API provide the SI class?
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:42:28 +0100
As of now it must be on a package level.
I assume, if the IP WG and EC ever finds a solution for those "stripped"
implementations, then SI could in theory use only some of the Quantity
interfaces or a user pick certain methods and leave out the rest (we would
of course have to provide some sort of tooling and more importantly a TCK
that takes all these variations into consideration;-O)
Werner
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Martin Desruisseaux <
>
wrote:
>
>
Le 16/12/14 19:27, Leonardo Lima a écrit :
>
> I guess if we have each as a class under an optional package, it would
>
> be ok.
>
>
Maybe phrasing my question in an other way: does optionality have to be
>
at a package level? Can it be at a class/interface granularity level? Or
>
at a member level?
>
>
Martin
>
>