Use Advanced Search to search the entire archive.
[jsr363-experts] Re: RI for Java ME
- From: Leonardo Lima <
>
- To: "
" <
>
- Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: RI for Java ME
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 13:46:15 -0600
Werner,
Please give me until Monday to review and respond, ok?
Thanks very much!
Leo.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Werner Keil
<
>
wrote:
>
All,
>
>
I looked into the Medemo (
>
https://github.com/unitsofmeasurement/uom-demos/tree/master/javame/medemo)
>
a bit the other day and it actually works fairly well now with Eclipse MTS.
>
Based on the latest Mars release (any with Java support should do, I used
>
the "Committers" edition) A relief and ease of use is, build and deployment
>
of the Midlets work directly from the IDE as long as dependent projects
>
(unit-api and unit-ri) have been imported and are available as source, too.
>
As long as both build at least with Java SE 7 or 8 it seems to work. Thus I
>
set both POMs to use 1.7 by default. For backward compatibility (and to
>
ensure, we have nothing that won't work in Java 6 like "Diamonds")
>
Circle-CI builds the API against Java 6 though with a special profile. RI
>
is already built against 7 anyway.
>
>
As long as there is no Java ME plugin for Maven (the last one was
>
http://pyx4me.com/pyx4me-maven-plugins/j2me-maven-plugin/index.html for
>
J2ME, it stopped in 2009) or other tools (nothing seems to exist for Gradle
>
either) a platform-neutral combination of Eclipse MTS (or as alternative
>
NetBeans, it works pretty much the same) project definitions looks like the
>
best approach. These contain all necessary ME 8 or MEEP profile definitons
>
and point to the correct runtime JARs assuming you have ME SDK installed.
>
It seems, that is available both on Windows and Linux now, so that also
>
offers a bit of a choice to developers.
>
>
I'll try to document some steps in the README file. And even if I may not
>
get it on a Raspberry Pi (I do have one, will try) I will of course show
>
the ME 8 demos as part of DevoXX next week.
>
Having the RI work on ME 8 and SE 7+ Embedded is also a good step towards
>
the Public Draft. Any concerns or comments about the spec?
>
>
I'd contact the PMO about a week from now (ideally before going to DevoXX,
>
so we can say "it's filed" from our side) if there are no major concerns or
>
issues.
>
>
Regards,
>
Werner
>