Use Advanced Search to search the entire archive.
[jsr363-experts] Re: Specification not ready for a release today
- From: Martin Desruisseaux <
>
- To:
- Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: Specification not ready for a release today
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 21:16:31 +0900
- Organization: Geomatys
Okay, thanks for the explanation.
In such case I would beg for the following: give me again about 4 hours
for continuing at least the bigger parts, and I would like that we
consider a second "Early stage" cycle maybe in 1 or 2 months.
Martin
Le 17/12/14 21:12, Werner Keil a écrit :
>
There is no strict wording on that, except what's here:
>
https://www.jcp.org/en/procedures/jcp2#2.3
>
>
>Multiple Early Drafts (and Early Draft Reviews) are encouraged where
>
the Expert Group feels that this would be helpful.
>
>
So if the whole EG feels it would be helpful to hold another Early
>
Draft, there could be one (or in theory also multiple) before entering
>
the next stage.
>
We must not take 2 years between them like 310 did (before JCP.next
>
got into effect;-) but say the Public Review JSR 354 had this January
>
followed by a PR 2 (per wish of the EG/Spec Lead, the EC actually
>
found the ballot with everyone voting and just 1 "No" vote by LJC
>
would not justify a second PR;-) in May this year could be a
>
reasonable interval if we wanted to repeat any of these stages.
>
>
Werner
>
>
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Martin Desruisseaux
>
<
>
<mailto:
>>
>
wrote:
>
>
Le 17/12/14 19:07, Werner Keil a écrit :
>
> I don't think you are aware what really drives the timeline?
>
> JCP.next requires every JSR to produce an EDR within 9 months.
>
Indeed, I was not aware of this deadline.
>
>
In such case, what are the conditions for a second "Early draft"
>
cycles
>
after the first one?
>
>
Martin
>