Use Advanced Search to search the entire archive.
[jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...
- From: Werner Keil <
>
- To: "
" <
>
- Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: Fwd: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...
- Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 11:55:13 +0200
Hi,
Just a quick reminder if you have a preference towards format of a "RI
guide"?
As of now, we have
- 3 votes for Gitbook
- 2 votes for Asciidoc
Thanks,
Werner
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Werner Keil
<
>
wrote:
>
Hoping to hear from GitBook users like Raj or Otavio, too..
>
>
Would you have a raking among those (both Mohamed and Chris)?
>
>
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Personal Mail
>
<
>
>
wrote:
>
>
> The same like Christopher
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> Mohamed Taman
>
>
>
> On Aug 3, 2015, at 7:40 PM, Chris Senior
>
> <
>
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> +1 asciidoc or gitbook
>
>
>
> On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 14:10 Werner Keil
>
> <
>
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> Dear Experts,
>
>>
>
>> About the task to factor out an RI guidline or tutorial
>
>> https://java.net/jira/browse/UNITSOFMEASUREMENT-155
>
>>
>
>> I can't find Chris who suggested the separate document in JIRA, but
>
>> everyone is welcome to help with that. I have not created a GitBook from
>
>> scratch yet, but looking at the book Otavio started for JSR 354
>
>> https://github.com/otaviojava/money-api-book even a separate repository
>
>> (it looks like you need that for GitBook?) with a descriptive name
>
>> (something like "unit-ri-guideline", "unit-ri-tutorial" etc.) actually
>
>> sounds quite appealing.
>
>>
>
>> Any preferences?
>
>> Please vote (either in the JIRA ticket or here) with +1 (or -1), not
>
>> voting would automatically be considered as "abstain" or "don't care"
>
>>
>
>> - Asciidoc (similar to JSR 354)
>
>> - Google Docs (separate document but like the Spec)
>
>> - GitBook
>
>>
>
>> Thanks,
>
>>
>
>> Werner
>
>>
>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>
>> From: Chris Senior (Google Docs) <
>
>>
>
>> >
>
>> Date: Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:54 PM
>
>> Subject: JSR 363 Specifica... - Should this be in a separate document...
>
>>
>
>>
>
>> Chris Senior added a comment to JSR 363 Specification
>
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/12KhosAFriGCczBs6gwtJJDfg_QlANT92_lhxUWO2gCY/edit?disco=AAAAAdjU7mw>
>
>> [image: Chris Senior]
>
>> *Chris Senior*
>
>> RI level SPI
>
>>
>
>> Should this be in a separate document? I find it confusing that the API
>
>> spec talks about things that are not part of the API...
>
>> You received this email because you are subscribed to all discussions on
>
>> JSR
>
>> 363 Specification
>
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/12KhosAFriGCczBs6gwtJJDfg_QlANT92_lhxUWO2gCY/edit?disco=AAAAAdjU7mw>
>
>> .Change what Google Docs sends you.
>
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/docos/notify?id=12KhosAFriGCczBs6gwtJJDfg_QlANT92_lhxUWO2gCY&title=JSR+363+Specification>You
>
>> can reply to this email to reply to the discussion.<logo.png>
>
>>
>
>>
>