Use Advanced Search to search the entire archive.
[jsr363-experts] Re: [VOTE] Artifact Name for ISO 80000 Module
- From: Werner Keil <
>
- To: "
" <
>
- Subject: [jsr363-experts] Re: [VOTE] Artifact Name for ISO 80000 Module
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 13:22:06 +0200
No dashes please, we'd have too many with other elements like version, etc.
(like "<artifactId>-java8-X.Y" or similar;-) but if you want, let's assume
your +1 for
"iso80k" as another alternative.
Thanks,
Werner
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Chris Senior
<
>
wrote:
>
What about iso-80k?
>
>
My main issue with iso80000 is the number of zeros (how may?) and the lack
>
of clear separation from the term "iso".
>
>
isq is a bit cryptic for me.
>
>
On 21 August 2015 at 09:27, Werner Keil
>
<
>
>
wrote:
>
>
> +1 for "isq"
>
>
>
> It's shorter, and e.g. with a "-java8" postfix we're going to see more
>
> added to it, so keeping an "8" or "80000" out of the name sounds better.
>
>
>
> Werner
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
>
Regards,
>
>
Chris
>